Growth Upgrades/Downgrades

When stalking a growth stock awaiting better entries or looking for new growth stock ideas, one of the best things you can do is get a hold of Wall Street's Upgrades and Downgrades each morning.  TheStreet.com has a good one if I recall as do 24/7 Wall Street and Benzinga.  Look for something a bit more in-depth that will give you a sentence or two synopsis of each analyst ratings change.  Learn to spot the bullsh*t downgrades over time and start studying how the higher-growth stocks tend to react to them - both initially and over the intermediate term.  Typically a fast-growing company will stumble on a specious analyst downgrade and then the accumulation will resume as the institutional fans of the story get over it and come back with buy orders.

What constitutes a bullsh*t downgrade?  Anything that can be perceived as having a hidden agenda or that sounds like the analyst is just looking to be a bit more visible or justify his work.  This happens all the time.  So do bullsh*t upgrades when a big client of a brokerage firm needs someone to drum up enough buyers to make an exit from a particular stock.  You can see it in the tape, little buyers cleaning up a big seller.

But I digress...

Some examples of Bullsh*t Downgrades:

1.  Valuation - growth stocks don't trade on "valuation", they trade on sentiment and the expectation of future earnings, see the numerous valuation-based downgrades of lululemon and Whole Foods.

2.  Dropping Coverage - believe it or not there are institutions who will actually sell on the news that a brokerage firm is dropping or suspending coverage in a name due to an analyst leaving or something.

3.  Channel Checks - there is only one thing sell-side analysts suck more at than tackle football and that is "channel checking" - they literally cannot do it in such a way that there are actionable insights to be gleaned from it.  Think about how many times you heard about strength in non-Apple tablets (there never really was any) or weakness in the iPhone 2 (also, never really happened).  Channel checks are a money-loser in most cases - wait for the actual hard data, forget what people say they'll do or think they'll do.

4.  Short-Term Pressures - chances are if you are interested in a growth stock investment, what happens tomorrow or the next day has little to do with anything.  For example, I saw an analyst downgrade Buffalo Wild Wings, one of this moment's greatest growth stories, because of a rise in chicken wing costs in early February.  And while the analyst was correct in terms of those costs rising, it's really a trivial, short-term matter to anyone who intends to invest in the business.   $BWLD is being bought for the massive national footprint they'll be building out for the next ten years, not a penny or two in wing costs.  The stock is up like 20 points in the 3 weeks since that downgrade, btw - managers in the growth space simply have to own it.

5.  Strategic Direction - some people are meant to run businesses and others are meant to analyze and critique them. When a company announces a new strategic direction or goal, the knee-jerk Wall Street response is to cut it to neutral due to "uncertainty".  I have no interest in seeing sell-side analysts vote on the strategic decisions of a company - management often knows more about their market than the eggheads do.